February 1, 2006
Audiophile Technology Wars at CES 2006
Press materials abounded at this years Consumer Electronics Show. Over the course of four days, I compiled a stack of marketing materials more than a foot thick -- and dumped them all into my hotel trashcan before heading off to the airport on Sunday night. Id gathered them because, when it came time to write captions for the SoundStage! Network CES show report on SoundStage! AV, I needed to make sure I had the details correct. Although I was most interested in model names and prices, the main thrust of these materials was the shiny new technology each company was employing in its latest products. This is nothing new -- each year, "breakthroughs" are announced that will seemingly revolutionize the industry.
The problem with touting such technologies is that they dont, in and of themselves, prove that the products are any good. We dont listen to component parts or to a single technology per se, but to the totality of a design. How does the average audiophile separate real breakthroughs in materials, parts, and design from marketing drivel created to blind you with "science"?
The only way to know how something actually performs is to test its performance -- pure and simple.
Is that too simplistic a case to make? I dont think so. If youre an audiophile, you must listen to the product. The important thing to keep in mind is that youre listening to the whole design rather than to any individual part.
Jim Thiel, of Thiel Audio, introduced at the 2006 CES his companys new CS3.7 loudspeaker -- by the companys own admission, the most radical Thiel design to date. Its predecessor, the CS3.6, dates all the way back to the early 1990s. The driver configurations are new -- as implemented in the CS3.7, Thiels coincident midrange-tweeter array is, according to Jim Thiel, quite an advance. The driver diaphragms themselves -- which, in the case of the midrange, is flat -- are ribbed in a way that reportedly increases their stiffness, which produces a more linear frequency response by avoiding cone breakup modes. The CS3.7 seems to include some real progress over past Thiel designs -- the theories propounded by Jim Thiel at least seem to be based on hard research and science. Or did Thiel Audio just have the sexiest marketing?
The most interesting part of the Thiel press conference, however, was when an attendee asked why Thiel doesnt use beryllium in their tweeters, instead of the aluminum the company has used for some time. I found Jim Thiels response refreshing and profound. To paraphrase: Beryllium is expensive to produce, and the money it would cost for the incremental increase in performance could be spent elsewhere for far greater gains. Essentially, the customers money could be spent more wisely in other places.
But wouldnt beryllium be needed to produce state-of-the-art high frequencies? Or how about diamond? That trumps beryllium, right? The questioner apparently knew that many companies are marketing these exotic driver materials as evidence that their designs have moved past their competitors products. Perhaps so -- Im no engineer. But what about Jim Thiels claims? Thiel speakers do, each time I hear them, sound quite good.
Driver materials no doubt address certain performance parameters. Drivers can be tested in many different ways, and can be implemented in a design in more ways than that. So what matters most? Theres no way an audiophile such as I can sort these things out -- except by listening and, as a secondary mode of research, examining good third-party measurements, such as the ones produced for SoundStage! I do recall overhearing a conversation that theorized on the marketing of tweeter-diaphragm material. One large company had just introduced a beryllium tweeter, and so their primary competitor had to counter with diamond just to keep the marketing department happy. How much fact there is in this tweeter competition I cant say. The timing of the respective product launches supports the allegation, however.
A message to product manufacturers: At the end of the day, I want exotic sound; exotic marketing is optional. If a new technology youre using to get from point A to point B is better, prove it by producing better sound. If you cant do that convincingly, then perhaps at your company its the marketing department that calls the tune.
Ultra Audio is part of the SoundStage! Network.