We welcome all feedback. If you'd like to make a comment on an article or ask any questions, please e-mail email@example.com. If your letter is selected for publication, your name will be printed but your e-mail address will NOT be.
To Jeff Fritz,
I recall an article that I wrote for SoundStage! Ultra in September 2008 (“The Birth and Life of an Audiophile: A Journey from Entry-Level to McIntosh”) about McIntosh Laboratory and wish to express my opinion that McIntosh Laboratory treats today’s technology tastefully by infusing it with timeless tradition.
My company, Sanch Electronix Ltd., was designated a McIntosh representative in 1982 and although the products became prohibitively expensive after a decade, we still provide service. In my article I described how, as part of my training, I had the experience of a lifetime: witnessing firsthand a demonstration of how the company’s most astute salesman, James Carroll, recruited his disciples.
I was excited to see that in September 2020, ever mindful of its “Rolls-Royce” philosophy, McIntosh launched the MA12000 hybrid integrated stereo amplifier. Its features include ten analog and seven digital inputs and a stereo output of 350Wpc RMS. In my opinion, this is an unequivocally future-proofed “statement” product that may be construed as the company’s aggressive response to COVID-19. Oh, how I would love to hear this colossus of a behemoth, this culmination of decades of selfless dedication to R&D in ergonomics, incorporating both vacuum-tube and solid-state technology.
Simeon Louis Sandiford
Trinidad and Tobago
To Hans Wetzel,
I’ve just ordered a pair of Sonus Faber Maxima Amators to be paired with a new Accuphase Laboratory E-380 integrated amplifier fed by a Lumin T2 network music player. The Maxima Amators were chosen for their smaller footprint in our room as well as their Old World looks. Do you think the Accuphase will be a good match? Thanks, I really enjoyed your review.
The Accuphase sounds like a terrific choice. I don’t have any personal experience with the company’s gear, but several of my fellow writers here at SoundStage! have sung Accuphase’s praises in terms of both build and sound quality. The E-380 should generate sufficient power for your needs. Enjoy your new system. . . . Hans Wetzel
To Jeff Fritz,
I have been following your hi-fi journey and reviews for some time now and you consistently have utilized a MacBook Air laptop, together with Roon, as your front-end streaming playback system. Do you believe that a specialist streamer solution, i.e., Aurender, Lumin, etc., does not provide you with the necessary upgrade to the sound performance required to warrant the cost of implementing such a system?
I would be interested in reading your thoughts on high-end streamers vs. MacBook Air front-end playback options, as the cost of these streaming solutions can be quite prohibitive. Maybe spending the money on a better DAC would be more effective?
This is a great question, and one I have been asked before. I have also pondered that question many times. On occasion I have had some very well-regarded streamers in my system, and each time, I’ve come away thinking, “Well, that sounds really good.” Then I go back to my MacBook Air and think to myself, “Well, that sounds really good, too!” Based on these experiences, I always conclude that the perceived improvement is not enough to move me to make a purchase and ditch the MacBook Air.
I’m sure this could be system dependent, and, I’d have to think, specifically related to the DAC. Having a really good DAC could obviate the need for a dedicated streamer depending on how that DAC handles the incoming data stream. Could it be that I would appreciate a dedicated streamer more if I had a different DAC? That’s certainly possible, and maybe I’ll discover the answer to that question down the line.
I’m open to hear more streamers, but until I hear something in my system that is demonstrably and repeatedly better than my Apple MacBook Air, I have no plans to change course. A better DAC, better speakers, a better amp . . . personally, I would prioritize all of these over the purchase of a dedicated music streamer. . . . Jeff Fritz
To Hans Wetzel,
I have read with great interest your various reviews of different amps and speakers over the years. My current setup is Dynaudio’s Confidence C1 [loudspeakers] paired with a Hegel Music Systems H360 [integrated amplifier-DAC]. Overall, I am happy with the sound, especially with the Dynaudios because I had their Contour 1.3 SEs in the past and just wanted to take that sound/philosophy to the next level. The Hegel was more a leap of faith, but a fellow hi-fi aficionado recommended them to pair with the Confidence C1, so I followed his recommendation and picked up a used Hegel. I like Hegel’s warm and natural sound and think it pairs well overall with the Dynaudios. Dislikes are that the [Apple] AirPlay connection is not reliable and does not give the best sound quality. I could have bought a streamer but did not feel like incurring the extra expense.
But now, I am looking to make a change and I’m considering these options—I want to stay in the $5000–$6000 range:
Not in a rush to make a move; I want to make sure it is the right choice. It is tough to audition the equipment, as every dealer has a different setup and equipment available, and it’s next to impossible to test the equipment at home. So, I need to make another decision based on reviews and expert recommendations. At this point, I am leaning towards a Hegel upgrade. For me, vocals, authenticity, and soundstage for classical music rank at the top of the list. Sorry for the long e-mail. It would be super nice to get your take.
You’ve made some interesting choices, Andreas, and you’ve definitely reached out to the right reviewer! I’ve previously owned the Hegel H360, own a Hegel H590 (which is very similar to the less powerful Hegel H390 you’re considering), reviewed the NAD M32 when it was new, and recently reviewed the successor to the Moon 700i, the 700i v2. Unfortunately, I don’t have any first-hand experience with McIntosh, though I suspect the MA5300 is a solid amp for the money.
I think the Hegel would be a sensible purchase. The built-in DAC, in particular, should prove to be a notable upgrade on the unit built into your H360. The H390 will sound a little different than your H360, however, as Doug Schneider pointed out in his review of the H390, but should still definitely sound familiar to you.
While I obviously like Hegel, I have to say that NAD’s M33 would be my personal suggestion. It uses Purifi’s new Eigentakt amplifier modules, which sound and measure like an absolute dream. You also get a terrific-looking case, a nice touchscreen, Dirac Live room-correction software, and plenty of I/O. I get that it’s a bit of a gamble for you having never heard it, so let me put it this way: As someone who adored my H360 when I owned it, if I were upgrading from an H360 and had roughly $5000 to spend, I’d spring for the M33, as it’s currently the best integrated amp-DAC that you can buy for five grand.
Happy hunting, Andreas. . . . Hans Wetzel
To Jeff Fritz,
As someone who owns a Gryphon Antileon Evo stereo amp, the dCS Vivaldi DAC, and Rockport Cygnus speakers, I obviously agree with your tastes. Two things I might add/change: I do believe that a good preamp adds something significant to sound quality, and I don’t believe the small difference in sound quality of the Antileon Monos justifies doubling the cost. In keeping with some of your more recent articles regarding value and opportunity cost, I would use the money saved on the Monos and put it into a good preamp, or into the listening room if you really want to run direct. As crazy high as these prices are I actually do think the dCS, Gryphon, and Rockport represent value in this crazy hobby.
I really enjoyed your articles about finding value and downsizing a bit. Avoiding the chase for bragging-rights gear that added very little. That took real courage. Don’t reverse course, Jeff. You’re the only one we can count on for telling the truth as you see it irrespective of the industry.
To Garrett Hongo,
I am looking into the Luxman D-380 CD player as a replacement for a vintage California Audio Labs Icon Mk II player. I will be using it with a Leben CS-600 amplifier and DeVore Fidelity Orangutan O/93 speakers. I am looking for a more organic and less harsh sound. My listening room is a tad on the bright side, so a sweeter sound is a must. I wonder if you have had any experience with the lower-priced Luxman CD players, as my wife is having a case of sticker shock.
From your review, it sounds like the D-380 is quite a gem in this digital audio world.
Thanks for your question about the Luxman D-380. I loved its sound, frankly, and wished I could splurge on it for my own family-room system. Along with Lector and Ayon players, I’ve got a venerable California Audio Labs CL-15 there, so I’m familiar with the CAL house sound. It was, in fact, my first high-end piece. But I’d always heard the CAL Icon Mk II was extra special.
I also know the rest of your system pretty well—the Leben integrated and DeVore Orangutan speakers. Terrific setup!
My feeling, fairly strong, actually, is you’ll be extremely happy with the D-380, which will be a great match with the rest of your system. The style of this player will shine and its sound will really bloom with your Leben/DeVore gear.
When thinking about the D-380 for myself, I also researched a lower-priced player from Luxman, the D-N150—a compact, half-size unit. Much more “affordable,” it has the same transport as the D-380 but with a different DAC and no tube output. I anticipated that I might be disappointed in its sound by comparison to the D-380.
The D-N150 also lacks the D-380’s retro wooden case. I’d say the D-N150’s style is more “swanky utilitarian,” if you don’t mind the contradiction, and better suited for a desktop system. But the D-380, with its gorgeous walnut case, would look fabulous with your DeVore 0/93s (assuming they’re in walnut too), both echoing and accenting their cabinets.
If I had to choose one player for my family-room system, it would be the Luxman D-380. Basically, I’d go for it if I were you, man. . . . Garrett Hongo
To Jeff Fritz,
I just purchased a pre-owned Gryphon Antileon Evo [amplifier]. Much of my decision was based on your reviews of the Antileon and Mephisto. The Antileon should arrive today or tomorrow. Now I have two of your favorite amps, the Antileon Evo and a Boulder 2060. I’ll let you know my impressions of the Antileon in a few weeks.
To Aron Garrecht,
I’m considering two of the amps you have reviewed to pair with my Trenner & Friedl Isis speakers. Well, actually, if you can weigh in on my choice between three amps, it would be much appreciated. I won’t have the opportunity to audition any of these amps, so your opinion would help a lot.
I’ve been reading your reviews and find your insights to be honest and thoroughly researched.
Thanks for the kind words. I’ll start off by saying I have not yet heard a pair of Trenner & Friedl speakers, nor am I that familiar with the Canary Reference Two amplifier.
Between the McIntosh MC1.25KW and the Merrill 118, you really couldn’t have selected two more polar-opposite amplifiers in terms of their sonic characters. The McIntosh amp puts forward a full, rich sound with a powerful bottom end, silky smooth yet neutral midrange, and a rather polite top end. I absolutely loved listening to this amplifier with classic rock, particularly at higher volumes, and I never found myself even coming close to any kind of listener fatigue, whatever the volume; there is a consistent sense of ease to this amplifier that I found very appealing.
The Merrill 118, on the other hand, left me with the impression that it thrives on communicating the last iota of detail from any recording. Tonally, it is exceedingly neutral, with a tighter, slightly more controlled bottom end than the McIntosh amp, a similar midrange neutrality and fluidity, but a considerably more detailed, airy top end. The Merrill is not a bright-sounding amplifier, but it is incredibly transparent, and sounds best with higher-quality recordings.
Both amplifiers are exceptionally well built and reportedly use very high-quality parts throughout, although I was not able to take a peek at the proprietary class-D circuitry inside the Merrill. I was impressed by the levels of fit and finish of both amplifiers; the Merrill struck me as having an exotic presence whereas the McIntosh had more of a luxurious, muscular feel to it.
Without knowing more about what you are looking for in terms of sonic character, or what your Trenner & Friedl speakers sound like, I really can’t offer you a recommendation of which amplifier might work better with your speakers. The Merrill and McIntosh both offer more than enough power and sufficient damping factor to easily drive and properly control the 15″ drivers in your speakers. During a quick look at the spec sheet for the Canary Reference Two I noticed that this amp only has a damping factor of 16, which is considerably lower than either the McIntosh or Merrill and could affect the bass performance, so this is something you may want to consider.
Perhaps what I can suggest is that if your speakers sound anything like my Paradigm Persona 7Fs, that is to say, unapologetically neutral, the McIntosh amp would be my choice.
I hope this was helpful, Ken, and do let me know which way you decide to go. . . . Aron Garrecht
To Jeff Fritz,
First, let me thank you for your contribution to the Rockport speaker knowledgebase that is so valuable to us audiophiles. I would like to buy a pair of Rockport Technologies Cygnus speakers to combine with Lamm components: LL2.1 Deluxe preamplifier, and class-A M1.2 Reference monoblocks. I would like to know if you have ever had the opportunity to audition these components with the Cygnus speakers. I am a big fan of classical music (symphonic, chamber music, early music), but I also listen to jazz. My listening room is 7m long, 5m wide, and 2.5m high. Thank you for taking your time to answer.
My experience with Lamm Electronics products goes back to April of 2004, when I reviewed the M1.2 Reference monoblocks that you are considering. I concluded that review by stating, “If the ultimate test of a great audio component is its ability to get the gestalt of music correct, the Lamm M1.2 Reference is great in every sense.” One thing I love about high-end audio is that if a component is fantastic, it will continue to be so for many years. I have no doubt the Lamm products are still top shelf and hold up today as some of the best. You’ve obviously read my writing on various Rockport Technologies speakers, and specifically my review of the mighty Cygnus. I concluded that review with a simple statement: “You can buy these and never look back.”
I think pairing the Lamm components with those Rockport speakers will result in surefire excellence. I know of nothing that would prevent these products from making a synergistic match that will thrill you in every way. Although I have not heard this pairing in person, I certainly think you are on the right track. Good luck with your system, and please do report back once you’ve made your purchase and have the speakers in your listening room (and send a photo!). . . . Jeff Fritz
To Howard Kneller,
Having read your article on the Esoteric Grandioso G1 master clock generator, I am hoping you can help me with a couple of questions about issues I am facing with my equipment.
I have the following devices: Esoteric K-01Xs SACD/CD player, Esoteric G-02X master clock, dCS Network Bridge streamer, and Roon Nucleus+ music server. My issue is when I stream music from the Roon to the dCS. I have set up Tidal, Qobuz, and my own NAS as music sources, and one track may be at 44.1kHz, followed by one at 96kHz, 176.4kHz, 192kHz, DSD, and so on. The dCS only accepts two clock inputs (44.1kHz and 48kHz). It auto-switches between these two inputs if a clock signal is present for the given sampling rate, otherwise it uses its own built-in clock.
While the manual for the G-02X states that separate frequencies can be generated, I have not been able to configure it do this at the same time. The output is either 44.1kHz or 48kHz and must be switched manually. Do you know if the G-02X can be configured to supply 44.1kHz on A or A1 and 48kHz on A2 or B? My ideal setup would be to supply 44.1kHz and 48kHz to the dCS at the same time and 10MHz to the K-01Xs.
Assuming that there is no way to get the G-02X to output dual frequencies, what is the next best setup? For instance, should I configure the dCS so it is not clocked by the G-02X and allow it to use its own internal clocks that auto-switch based on sample rate? The K-01Xs is clocked at 10MHz from the G-02X. Clocking at 10MHz, will that sync to all possible sample rates? Which 10MHz signal output is better, TTL or sine wave?
I’ve tried to incorporate the dCS in a few different configurations, but I always seem to end up with a cyclical noise being generated. Any help you can offer would be greatly appreciated.
The rest of my audio system comprises Wilson Audio Sasha DAW loudspeakers, a Spectral Audio DMC-30SV preamplifier, and a Spectral DMA-300SV power amplifier, with MIT Level 1 cabling throughout. The only analog piece is my antique Nakamichi Dragon cassette deck, which sonically holds its own pretty well. No vinyl, because that was all incinerated, along with everything we owned (including MBL 101 and Snell Acoustics Type A Reference speakers) in the Camp Fire wildfire in Paradise, California, on Nov. 8, 2018. With the loss of 40+ years of collecting vinyl, I decided to go all-digital.
Thanks for writing to me. You certainly have some fantastic gear -- I am sorry to hear about the loss of your previous stereo system in the California fires.
The G-02X clock can only output one frequency at a time because it has a single internal oscillator. Each output of the G-02X can be set independently and must be switched manually. I double-checked this with Esoteric’s North American distributor, and he in turn double-checked with Esoteric, who confirmed this information. With regard to how you should proceed from here, that really depends on the level of convenience you want and your impressions of the sound quality achieved by the various options available. We can discuss this further by e-mail if you like as it gets a bit too complex to describe in detail in this forum.
I hope this helps even if it’s not the answer that you were hoping for. . . . Howard Kneller
All contents available on this website are copyrighted by SoundStage!® and Schneider Publishing Inc., unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.
This site was designed by Rocket Theme, Karen Fanas, and The SoundStage! Network.
To contact us, please e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org